Roadmap
Overview¶
This is our public roadmap that outlines the high level direction we are working towards, namely Themes. We update this document when our priorities change: security and stability is our top priority.
See our latest list of activities Β»
Themes¶
Operational Excellence is priority number 1.
Themes are key activities maintainers are focusing on, besides bug reports. These are updated periodically and you can get an idea of the overall progress in the Milestones section.
New utilities¶
After going GA, we want to start working on new utilities, specifically but not limited to the most commonly asked: (1) Idempotency, (2) Parameters and (3) Batch.
Improve operational excellence¶
We continue to work on increasing operational excellence to remove as much undifferentiated heavylifting for maintainers, so that we can focus on delivering features that help you.
This means improving our automation workflows, and project management, and test coverage.
Roadmap status definition¶
graph LR
Ideas --> Backlog --> Work["Working on it"] --> Merged["Coming soon"] --> Shipped
Visual representation
Within our public board, you'll see the following values in the Status
column:
- Ideas. Incoming and existing feature requests that are not being actively considered yet. These will be reviewed when bandwidth permits and based on demand.
- Backlog. Accepted feature requests or enhancements that we want to work on.
- Working on it. Features or enhancements we're currently either researching or implementing it.
- Coming soon. Any feature, enhancement, or bug fixes that have been merged and are coming in the next release.
- Shipped. Features or enhancements that are now available in the most recent release.
- On hold. Features or items that are currently blocked until further notice.
- Pending review. Features which implementation is mostly completed, but need review and some additional iterations.
Tasks or issues with empty
Status
will be categorized in upcoming review cycles.
Process¶
graph LR
PFR[Feature request] --> Triage{Need RFC?}
Triage --> |Complex/major change or new utility?| RFC[Ask or write RFC] --> Approval{Approved?}
Triage --> |Minor feature or enhancement?| NoRFC[No RFC required] --> Approval
Approval --> |Yes| Backlog
Approval --> |No | Reject["Inform next steps"]
Backlog --> |Prioritized| Implementation
Backlog --> |Defer| WelcomeContributions["help-wanted label"]
Visual representation
Our end-to-end mechanism follows four major steps:
- Feature Request. Ideas start with a feature request to outline their use case at a high level. For complex use cases, maintainers might ask for/write a RFC.
- Maintainers review requests based on project tenets, customers reaction (π), and use cases.
- Request-for-comments (RFC). Design proposals use our RFC issue template to describe its implementation, challenges, developer experience, dependencies, and alternative solutions.
- This helps refine the initial idea with community feedback before a decision is made.
- Decision. After carefully reviewing and discussing them, maintainers make a final decision on whether to start implementation, defer or reject it, and update everyone with the next steps.
- Implementation. For approved features, maintainers give priority to the original authors for implementation unless it is a sensitive task that is best handled by maintainers.
See Maintainers document to understand how we triage issues and pull requests, labels and governance.
Disclaimer¶
The Powertools for AWS Lambda team values feedback and guidance from its community of users, although final decisions on inclusion into the project will be made by AWS.
We determine the high-level direction for our open roadmap based on customer feedback and popularity (ππ½ and comments), security and operational impacts, and business value. Where features donβt meet our goals and longer-term strategy, we will communicate that clearly and openly as quickly as possible with an explanation of why the decision was made.
FAQs¶
Q: Why did you build this?
A: We know that our customers are making decisions and plans based on what we are developing, and we want to provide our customers the insights they need to plan.
Q: Why are there no dates on your roadmap?
A: Because job zero is security and operational stability, we can't provide specific target dates for features. The roadmap is subject to change at any time, and roadmap issues in this repository do not guarantee a feature will be launched as proposed.
Q: How can I provide feedback or ask for more information?
A: For existing features, you can directly comment on issues. For anything else, please open an issue.